Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309031›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2022

Postgraduate examination: How to match your presentation skills with examiner's expectations?

Baljit Singh, Jigeeshu V Divatia, Aloka Samantaray, Naveen Malhotra, Sadhana Sudhir Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baljit SinghDepartment of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Jigeeshu V DivatiaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Aloka SamantarayDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Naveen MalhotraDepartment of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Pain Management Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Sadhana Sudhir KulkarniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, MGM Medical College, Aurangabad, Co-unit of MGMIHS, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passing the exit Doctor of Medicine/Diplomate of National Board examination is a significant but challenging milestone in the career of any student. A strong knowledge base is the foundation on which a student can build an impactful performance. Knowledge core is tested in the theory part of the examination and its application to patient care during case presentations and viva in the practical examination. Performance during the practicals has one common denominator: convincing the examiner that the patient during anaesthesia would be safe in the student's hands. The way the student answers, the spontaneity and the confidence that the student exudes in answering, the pointed answers to the questions asked, and setting the priorities right when dealing with a multitude of tasks at hand go a long way in ensuring that. This article describes what examiners expect from students and provides tips to postgraduate students preparing for the examination.

Indexed as

AnaesthesiaexaminationexpectationsIndiapostgraduatepresentation

Identifiers

PMID35309031
PMCPMC8929316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.