ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
seGMM: A New Tool for Gender Determination From Massively Parallel Sequencing Data.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-ancestry genetic reference for the Quebec population.Nature communications · 2026Article
- XhetRel: a pipeline for X heterozygosity and relatedness analysis of sequencing data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.Genome medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical genetic testing, checking the concordance between self-reported gender and genotype-inferred gender from genomic data is a significant quality control measure because mismatched gender due to sex chromosomal abnormalities or misregistration of clinical information can significantly affect molecular diagnosis and treatment decisions. Targeted gene sequencing (TGS) is widely recommended as a first-tier diagnostic step in clinical genetic testing. However, the existing gender-inference tools are optimized for whole genome and whole exome data and are not adequate and accurate for analyzing TGS data. In this study, we validated a new gender-inference tool, seGMM, which uses unsupervised clustering (Gaussian mixture model) to determine the gender of a sample. The seGMM tool can also identify sex chromosomal abnormalities in samples by aligning the sequencing reads from the genotype data. The seGMM tool consistently demonstrated >99% gender-inference accuracy in a publicly available 1,000-gene panel dataset from the 1,000 Genomes project, an in-house 785 hearing loss gene panel dataset of 16,387 samples, and a 187 autism risk gene panel dataset from the Autism Clinical and Genetic Resources in China (ACGC) database. The performance and accuracy of seGMM was significantly higher for the targeted gene sequencing (TGS), whole exome sequencing (WES), and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets compared to the other existing gender-inference tools such as PLINK, seXY, and XYalign. The results of seGMM were confirmed by the short tandem repeat analysis of the sex chromosome marker gene, amelogenin. Furthermore, our data showed that seGMM accurately identified sex chromosomal abnormalities in the samples. In conclusion, the seGMM tool shows great potential in clinical genetics by determining the sex chromosomal karyotypes of samples from massively parallel sequencing data with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.