Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35309965›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2022

Cell-Seeded Biomaterial Scaffolds: The Urgent Need for Unanswered Accelerated Angiogenesis.

Hanieh Shokrani, Amirhossein Shokrani, S Mohammad Sajadi, Farzad Seidi, Amin Hamed Mashhadzadeh, Navid Rabiee, Mohammad Reza Saeb, Tejraj Aminabhavi, Thomas J Webster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Polysaccharide-based biomaterials in a journey from 3D to 4D printing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Hanieh Shokrani *Department of Chemical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein Shokrani *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
S Mohammad SajadiDepartment of Nutrition, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil, 625, Iraq.
Farzad SeidiJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources and International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, People's Republic of China.
Amin Hamed MashhadzadehMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8146-8198
Navid RabieeDepartment of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-8541
Mohammad Reza SaebDepartment of Polymer Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-9414
Tejraj AminabhaviSchool of Advanced Sciences, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, Karnataka, 580 031, India.
Thomas J WebsterSchool of Health Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Hebei University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000- 0002-2028-5969
Sharif University of Technology · IRCihan University-Erbil · IQGdańsk University of Technology · PLHebei University · CNKarnatak University · INNanjing Forestry University · CNNazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most arduous challenges in tissue engineering is neovascularization, without which there is a lack of nutrients delivered to a target tissue. Angiogenesis should be completed at an optimal density and within an appropriate period of time to prevent cell necrosis. Failure to meet this challenge brings about poor functionality for the tissue in comparison with the native tissue, extensively reducing cell viability. Prior studies devoted to angiogenesis have provided researchers with some biomaterial scaffolds and cell choices for angiogenesis. For example, while most current angiogenesis approaches require a variety of stimulatory factors ranging from biomechanical to biomolecular to cellular, some other promising stimulatory factors have been underdeveloped (such as electrical, topographical, and magnetic). When it comes to choosing biomaterial scaffolds in tissue engineering for angiogenesis, key traits rush to mind including biocompatibility, appropriate physical and mechanical properties (adhesion strength, shear stress, and malleability), as well as identifying the appropriate biomaterial in terms of stability and degradation profile, all of which may leave essential trace materials behind adversely influencing angiogenesis. Nevertheless, the selection of the best biomaterial and cells still remains an area of hot dispute as such previous studies have not sufficiently classified, integrated, or compared approaches. To address the aforementioned need, this review article summarizes a variety of natural and synthetic scaffolds including hydrogels that support angiogenesis. Furthermore, we review a variety of cell sources utilized for cell seeding and influential factors used for angiogenesis with a concentrated focus on biomechanical factors, with unique stimulatory factors. Lastly, we provide a bottom-to-up overview of angiogenic biomaterials and cell selection, highlighting parameters that need to be addressed in future studies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsTissue ScaffoldsHydrogelsNeovascularization, PhysiologicTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsangiogenesisbiomaterialsbiomechanical factorsneovascularizationpolymeric scaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35309965
PMCPMC8927652
OpenAlexW4221063411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.