Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35311627›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2022

Scaling up Locally Adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for Improving Childbirth Care in Tanzania: A Protocol for Programme Theory and Qualitative Methods of the PartoMa Scale-up Study.

Jane Brandt Sørensen, Natasha Housseine, Nanna Maaløe, Ib Christian Bygbjerg, Britt Pinkowski Tersbøl, Flemming Konradsen, Brenda Sequeira Dmello, Thomas van Den Akker, Jos van Roosmalen, Sangeeta Mookherji and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co-Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 'Global health action · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jane Brandt SørensenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Natasha HousseineMedical College, Aga Khan University, Medical College East Africa, Dar Es Salaam Campus Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-7815
Nanna MaaløeGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ib Christian BygbjergGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9100-2754
Britt Pinkowski TersbølGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-1317
Flemming KonradsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1036-6949
Brenda Sequeira DmelloGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas van Den AkkerAthena Institute is the department, Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos van RoosmalenAthena Institute is the department, Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sangeeta MookherjiDepartment of Global Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington DC, US.
Eunice SiaityMedical college, Aga Khan University, School of Nursing and Midwifery East Africa, Dar Es Salaam Campus Tanzania.
Haika OsakiGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6119-7079
Rashid Saleh KhamisGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8339-7415
Monica Lauridsen KujabiGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-3417
Thomas Wiswa JohnGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Wolf MeyrowitschGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-8987
Columba MbekengaMedical college, Aga Khan University, School of Nursing and Midwifery East Africa, Dar Es Salaam Campus Tanzania.
Morten SkovdalSection for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2068-1814
Hussein L KidantoMedical College, Aga Khan University, Medical College East Africa, Dar Es Salaam Campus Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-8068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective, low-cost clinical interventions to improve facility-based care during childbirth are critical to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings. While health interventions for low- and lower-middle-income countries are often developed and implemented top-down, needs and circumstances vary greatly across locations. Our pilot study in Zanzibar improved care through locally co-created intrapartum clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and associated training (the PartoMa intervention). This intervention was context-tailored with health-care providers in Zanzibar and now scaled up within five maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. This PartoMa Scale-up Study thereby provides an opportunity to explore the co-creation process and modification of the intervention in another context and how scale-up might be successfully achieved. The overall protocol is presented in a separate paper. The aim of the present paper is to account for the Scale-up Study's programme theory and qualitative methodology. We introduce social practice theory and argue for its value within the programme theory and towards qualitative explorations of shifts in clinical practice. The theory recognizes that the practice we aim to strengthen - safe and respectful clinical childbirth care - is not practiced in a vacuum but embedded within a socio-material context and intertwined with other practices. Methodologically, the project draws on ethnographic and participatory methodologies to explore current childbirth care practices. In line with our programme theory, explorations will focus on meanings of childbirth care, material tools and competencies that are being drawn upon, birth attendants' motivations and relational contexts, as well as other everyday practices of childbirth care. Insights generated from this study will not only elucidate active ingredients that make the PartoMa intervention feasible (or not) but develop the knowledge foundation for scaling-up and replicability of future interventions based on the principles of co-creation and contextualisation.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalMotivationFemaleHumansParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyTanzaniaco-creationinterventionobstetricsPractice theoryrespectful maternity care

Identifiers

PMID35311627
PMCPMC8942528

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.