Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35313957›Full record

Observational studyMolecular autism2022

The autism biomarkers consortium for clinical trials: evaluation of a battery of candidate eye-tracking biomarkers for use in autism clinical trials.

Frederick Shic, Adam J Naples, Erin C Barney, Shou An Chang, Beibin Li, Takumi McAllister, Minah Kim, Kelsey J Dommer, Simone Hasselmo, Adham Atyabi and 18 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Molecular autism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Eye Tracking as a Treatment Monitoring Tool for Autism: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Autism Digital Phenotyping in Preschool- and School-Age Children.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  19. Visual and auditory attention in individuals with DYRK1A and SCN2A disruptive variants.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Frederick ShicCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. fshic@uw.edu.
Adam J NaplesYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Erin C BarneyCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Shou An ChangDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Beibin LiCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Takumi McAllisterYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Minah KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, 102 Gilmer Hall, P.O. Box 400400, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.
Kelsey J DommerCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Simone HasselmoYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Adham AtyabiCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Quan WangYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Gerhard HellemanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
April R LevinDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Helen SeowYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Raphael BernierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katarzyna CharwaskaYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Geraldine DawsonDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
James DziuraEmergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Susan FajaHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shafali Spurling JesteDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Scott P JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael MuriasInstitute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Charles A NelsonHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Maura Sabatos-DeVitoDuke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Damla SenturkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Catherine A SugarDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sara J WebbCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
James C McPartlandYale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. james.mcpartland@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-0746

Funding

The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical TrialsU19MH108206 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DZIURA, JAMES DAVID · 2015 to 2024
$68.8M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Genetic Analysis and Manipulation Core (GAEC)P50HD105351 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCOTT Loren POMEROY, MUSTAFA SAHIN · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
Neural Correlates of Biological Motion Perception in Children with ASDK01MH104739 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHIC, FREDERICK · 2015 to 2018
$706k
Biomarker Qualification Plan Development for the Oculomotor Index of Gaze to Human FacesU01FD007000 · FDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCPARTLAND, JAMES CHARLES · 2020 to 2020
$249k
FDA HHS U01 FD007000NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105351NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH104739NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH108206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye tracking (ET) is a powerful methodology for studying attentional processes through quantification of eye movements. The precision, usability, and cost-effectiveness of ET render it a promising platform for developing biomarkers for use in clinical trials for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

methodsThe autism biomarkers consortium for clinical trials conducted a multisite, observational study of 6-11-year-old children with ASD (n = 280) and typical development (TD, n = 119). The ET battery included: Activity Monitoring, Social Interactive, Static Social Scenes, Biological Motion Preference, and Pupillary Light Reflex tasks. A priori, gaze to faces in Activity Monitoring, Social Interactive, and Static Social Scenes tasks were aggregated into an Oculomotor Index of Gaze to Human Faces (OMI) as the primary outcome measure. This work reports on fundamental biomarker properties (data acquisition rates, construct validity, six-week stability, group discrimination, and clinical relationships) derived from these assays that serve as a base for subsequent development of clinical trial biomarker applications.

resultsAll tasks exhibited excellent acquisition rates, met expectations for construct validity, had moderate or high six-week stabilities, and highlighted subsets of the ASD group with distinct biomarker performance. Within ASD, higher OMI was associated with increased memory for faces, decreased autism symptom severity, and higher verbal IQ and pragmatic communication skills. LIMITATIONS: No specific interventions were administered in this study, limiting information about how ET biomarkers track or predict outcomes in response to treatment. This study did not consider co-occurrence of psychiatric conditions nor specificity in comparison with non-ASD special populations, therefore limiting our understanding of the applicability of outcomes to specific clinical contexts-of-use. Research-grade protocols and equipment were used; further studies are needed to explore deployment in less standardized contexts.

conclusionsAll ET tasks met expectations regarding biomarker properties, with strongest performance for tasks associated with attention to human faces and weakest performance associated with biological motion preference. Based on these data, the OMI has been accepted to the FDA's Biomarker Qualification program, providing a path for advancing efforts to develop biomarkers for use in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderBiomarkersChildEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansBiomarkersAutism spectrum disorderBiological motionBiomarkersEye trackingFace processingGaze patternVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID35313957
PMCPMC10124777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.