Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35314763›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2023

Perceptions of pharmacists on the quality of automated blood pressure devices: a national survey.

Dean S Picone, Gregory M Peterson, Shane L Jackson, Norm R C Campbell, Christian Delles, Michael Hecht Olsen, Raj Padwal, Aletta E Schutte, James E Sharman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Dean S PiconeMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. dean.picone@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4760-1634
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Shane L JacksonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Norm R C CampbellDepartment of Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-4742
Christian DellesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2238-2612
Michael Hecht OlsenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark.
Raj PadwalDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-2817
Aletta E SchutteSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-4937
James E SharmanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-0811
University of Tasmania · AUNorth-West University · ZAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study found that only 23.8% of blood pressure (BP) devices available for purchase from Australian pharmacies were validated for accuracy. The extent to which pharmacists are aware of this, and other issues related to the accuracy of BP devices, is not known and gathering this information was the aim of this study. An online survey of Australian pharmacists was distributed via the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia between 1 October and 25 November 2020. Questions were focused on the views of pharmacists related to the accuracy of BP devices. Two hundred and ten pharmacists completed the survey. The accuracy of BP devices sold by pharmacists was considered 'quite' or 'extremely important' to most respondents (94%). However, most respondents (90%) were unaware that less than one-quarter of BP devices sold by Australian pharmacies were validated, and this was 'quite' or 'extremely surprising' to many (69%). Many respondents (64%) associated a particular brand of BP device with greater accuracy. There was low awareness on proper ways to identify accurate BP devices, such as checking reputable online databases (43%). BP devices were stocked in respondents' pharmacies based on perceived quality (50%), accuracy (40%), or as determined by the pharmacy chain (36%). In conclusion, providing accurate BP devices to consumers is important to pharmacists, but they were generally unaware that most devices available from pharmacies were not validated for accuracy. Pharmacist education, alongside advocacy for policies including regulations and strategic action, is required to ensure only validated BP devices are sold in Australia.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmacistsAustraliaBlood PressureHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35314763
PMCPMC9995266
OpenAlexW4220713750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.