ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2022
How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?
Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of ankle-foot prosthesis design on gait and standing performance in transfemoral prosthesis users: A scoping review.Wearable technologies · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.
objectiveTo analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters. STUDY
designInterventional cross sectional study.
methodsLevel walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.
resultsThe ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.
conclusionsThe additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.