Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316665›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2022

Structure of respiratory complex I - An emerging blueprint for the mechanism.

Domen Kampjut, Leonid A Sazanov

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. NADThe EMBO journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Action at a distance: The remarkable coupling of COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Respiratory complex IIIbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Growth physiology, genomics, and proteomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. BiallelicBrain communications · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Domen KampjutMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/DKampjut.
Leonid A SazanovInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria. Electronic address: sazanov@ist.ac.at.
Institute of Science and Technology Austria · ATTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105174197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex I is one of the major respiratory complexes, conserved from bacteria to mammals. It oxidises NADH, reduces quinone and pumps protons across the membrane, thus playing a central role in the oxidative energy metabolism. In this review we discuss our current state of understanding the structure of complex I from various species of mammals, plants, fungi, and bacteria, as well as of several complex I-related proteins. By comparing the structural evidence from these systems in different redox states and data from mutagenesis and molecular simulations, we formulate the mechanisms of electron transfer and proton pumping and explain how they are conformationally and electrostatically coupled. Finally, we discuss the structural basis of the deactivation phenomenon in mammalian complex I.

Indexed as

Electron Transport Complex IProtonsAnimalsElectron TransportEnergy MetabolismMammalsOxidation-ReductionElectron Transport Complex IProtons

Identifiers

PMID35316665
PMCPMC7613608
OpenAlexW4220876242

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.