Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35316902›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2022

A comparative study on ultrasound-guided elite, Mammotome, and core needle biopsy for diagnosing malignant breast masses.

Shi-Fang Zou, Lin Tao, Zhen-Chu Feng, Ji-Yan Wang, Lin Liu, Wen-Long Liang, Jie-Na Liu, Dan-Dan Xu, Jia-Yan Lin, Jian-Guo Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shi-Fang ZouThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lin TaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zhen-Chu FengThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Ji-Yan WangThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Lin LiuThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Wen-Long LiangThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jie-Na LiuThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dan-Dan XuThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jia-Yan LinThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jian-Guo ZhangThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xi ChenThe 8 Ward of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aims to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of elite biopsy, to provide a reference for selecting the puncture method. Material and methods: A total of 802 patients with a BI-RADS grade ≥ 4, as evaluated by the molybdenum target, and measurable lesions revealed by colour Doppler ultrasound, who were admitted at our department from January 2017 to January 2018, were enrolled in the present study. These patients were randomly divided into three groups: elite, Mammotome and core needle biopsy groups. The pathological underestimation rate, diagnostic accordance rate, haematoma incidence rate, and costs of these three biopsy methods were compared. Results: The difference in diagnostic accordance rates between the elite biopsy group and core needle biopsy group was statistically significant (98.9% vs. 94.7%, Conclusions: Elite biopsy has a low rate of pathological underestimation and low incidence of haematoma, can improve the breast conserving rate, and has an affordable cost. As a biopsy method with high accuracy, safety, and economy, elite biopsy can be widely used in clinics.

Indexed as

breast massescore needle biopsydiagnosiselite biopsyMammotome biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35316902
PMCPMC8924845
OpenAlexW2972235974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.