Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318565›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022

A multistep in vitro hemocompatibility testing protocol recapitulating the foreign body reaction to nanocarriers.

Valeria Perugini, Ruth Schmid, Ýrr Mørch, Isabelle Texier, Martin Brodde, Matteo Santin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in constructing biocompatible nanocarriers.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. REFINE special issue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Valeria PeruginiCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Devices, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton - Huxley Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK.
Ruth SchmidDepartment of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
Ýrr MørchDepartment of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
Isabelle TexierUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI-DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Martin BroddeOxProtect GmbH, Munster, Germany.
Matteo SantinCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Devices, School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton - Huxley Building, Lewes Road, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK. m.santin@brighton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5260-7088
SINTEF · NOUniversity of Brighton · GBCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of drug nanocarriers based on polymeric, lipid and ceramic biomaterials has been paving the way to precision medicine, where the delivery of poorly soluble active compounds and personalized doses are made possible. However, the nano-size character of these carriers has been demonstrated to have the potential to elicit pathways of the host response different from those of the same biomaterials when engineered as larger size implants and of the drugs when administered without a carrier. Therefore, a specific regulatory framework needs to be made available that can offer robust scientific insights and provide safety data by reliable tests of these novel nano-devices. In this context, the present work presents a multistep protocol for the in vitro assessment of the hemocompatibility of nanocarriers of different physicochemical properties. Poly (ethyl butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles and lipid-based (LipImage™ 815) nanoparticles of comparable hydrodynamic diameter were tested through a battery of assays using human peripheral blood samples and recapitulating the main pathways of the host response upon systemic administration; i.e., protein interactions, fibrinogen-platelet binding, cytotoxicity, and inflammatory response. The data showed the sensitivity and reproducibility of the methods adopted that were also demonstrated to determine individual variability as well as to discriminate between activation of pathways of inflammation and unintended release of inflammatory signaling caused by loss of cell integrity. Therefore, this multistep testing is proposed as a reliable protocol for nanoparticle development and emerging regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersForeign-Body ReactionHumansLipidsMaterials TestingPharmaceutical PreparationsReproducibility of ResultsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersLipidsPharmaceutical PreparationsCytotoxicityDrug nanocarriersHemocompatibilityHost responseInflammatory responseIn vitro testsLipid nanoparticlesNanobiomaterialsPolymeric nanoparticlesProtein coronaThrombogenicity

Identifiers

PMID35318565
PMCPMC9360154
OpenAlexW4220847989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.