ArticleOphthalmic genetics2022
Article in Ophthalmic genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presentation of Bilateral Optic Disc Coloboma-Morning Glory Syndrome in Mother and Son, with Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Father.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Loss of Hippo signaling causes transdifferentiation of neural retina between the optic fissure edges causing coloboma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- TRACE: A Framework for Integrating Transcript Relevance Into ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation.Human mutation · 2026Review
- CCN-Hippo YAP signaling in vision and its role in neuronal, glial and vascular cell function and behavior.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Review
- ARHGAP35 is a novel factor disrupted in human developmental eye phenotypes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Optic cup morphogenesis across species and related inborn human eye defects.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUveal colobomata are eye defects that result from failure of the optic fissure of the neuroectoderm-derived optic cup to close between weeks 5-7 of fetal life. Mutations in YAP1 have previously been linked to uveal coloboma. We present the clinical features and genetic basis of a one-year-old male with bilateral uveal colobomata. MATERIALS AND
methodsClinical features were gathered from an age-appropriate evaluation and retrospectively from clinical records. DNA samples were collected from the proband, his uncle (who also had coloboma), both parents, and one sibling. Whole-genome sequencing of the coding regions and intron-exon boundaries confirmed a mutation in the proband. These genetic findings were verified using the Sanger method of DNA sequencing.
resultsThe proband is a male with congenital bilateral colobomata (iris/retina/nerve), reduced vision, nystagmus with null point, bilateral microcornea, right microphthalmia, possible mild right hemifacial microsomia, a tubular nose, possible spina bifida occulta, and astigmatism. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed a heterozygous YAP1 frameshift mutation NM_001130145.3:c.178dupG p.(Asp60GlyfsTer52) in the proband. This mutation was absent in all other tested family members.
conclusionsWe report a de novo mutation in YAP1 that likely results in nonsense-mediated decay. Given the association with YAP1 haploinsufficiency and colobomatous microphthalmia, this novel variant provides a molecular diagnosis for the proband. Further insight into
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.