Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35319651›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia

Prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of combined treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implants.

María Moreno-López, Pablo de-Arriba-Palomero, Fernando de-Arriba-Palomero, Federico Peralta Ituruburu, Elisabet de Dompablo, Francisco José Muñoz- Negrete

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

María Moreno-LópezOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo de-Arriba-PalomeroOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5663-6302
Fernando de-Arriba-PalomeroOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Federico Peralta IturuburuOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Elisabet de DompabloOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco José Muñoz- NegreteOphthalmology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of in---travitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch and central retinal vein occlusion.

methodsThis was a prospective interventional non-comparative study, 44 eyes of patients with naïve macular edema related to branch and central retinal vein occlusion were treated with a dexamethasone implant. Patients were followed-up at four-week intervals from the second to the sixth month. If persistent or recurrent macular edema occurred during this period, the patient was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections on an as-needed basis. The outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness changes.

resultsThe mean best-corrected visual acuity changed from 0.97 ± 0.33 LogMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.40 at the six-month post-implant examination (p<0.00001). Improvement ≥3 Snellen lines were seen in 20 eyes (45.54%). The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 670.25 ± 209.9 microns. This had decreased to 317.43 ± 112.68 microns at the six-month follow-up (p<0.00001). The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections received in the six months post-implant was 2.32. The mean time from dexamethasone implant to first anti-VEGF injection was 3.45 months.

conclusionsIntravitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant were found to improve best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion at six months, with few intravitreal injections required.

Indexed as

Macular EdemaRetinal Vein OcclusionBevacizumabDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeBevacizumabDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID35319651
PMCPMC11826545
OpenAlexW4221093741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.