Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323365›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Mapping Canadian Data Assets to Generate Real-World Evidence: Lessons Learned from Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration's RWE Data Working Group.

Wei Fang Dai, Claire de Oliveira, Scott Blommaert, Reka E Pataky, David Tran, Zeb Aurangzeb, Cynthia Kendell, Chris Folkins, Chandy Somayaji, Jeff Dowden and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. When should RWE studies be prioritized for reimbursement? Insights from the Canadian perspective.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Third-line treatment patterns in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world data in Canada.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Wei Fang DaiTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Claire de OliveiraCentre for Health Economics and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-6008
Scott BlommaertSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2345-6604
Reka E PatakyCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-582X
David TranSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina SK S4W 0G3, Canada.
Zeb AurangzebCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Cynthia KendellDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Chris FolkinsNew Brunswick Institute for Research, Data and Training, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8, Canada.
Chandy SomayajiNew Brunswick Institute for Research, Data and Training, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8, Canada.
Jeff DowdenCancer Care Program, Eastern Health, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Winson CheungDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
Erin StrumpfDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2T7, Canada.
Jaclyn M BecaCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Canada.
Carol McClurePrince Edward Island Cancer Registry, Government of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 9L2, Canada.
Robin UrquhartDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
James Ted McDonaldNew Brunswick Institute for Research, Data and Training, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8, Canada.
Riaz AlviSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina SK S4W 0G3, Canada.
Donna TurnerCancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
Stuart PeacockCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Canada.
Avram DenburgDivision of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0039-0742
Rebecca E MercerCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Canada.
Caroline MuñozOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada.
Ambica ParmarSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Mina TadrousWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-6129
Pam TakharOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
On Behalf Of The CanREValue Collaboration

Funding

CIHR 154126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canadian provinces routinely collect patient-level data for administrative purposes. These real-world data (RWD) can be used to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to inform clinical care and healthcare policy. The CanREValue Collaboration is developing a framework for the use of RWE in cancer drug funding decisions. A Data Working Group (WG) was established to identify data assets across Canada for generating RWE of oncology drugs. The mapping exercise was conducted using an iterative scan with informant surveys and teleconference. Data experts from ten provinces convened for a total of three teleconferences and two in-person meetings from March 2018 to September 2019. Following each meeting, surveys were developed and shared with the data experts which focused on identifying databases and data elements, as well as a feasibility assessment of conducting RWE studies using existing data elements and resources. Survey responses were compiled into an interim data report, which was used for public stakeholder consultation. The feedback from the public consultation was used to update the interim data report. We found that databases required to conduct real-world studies are often held by multiple different data custodians. Ninety-seven databases were identified across Canada. Provinces held on average 9 distinct databases (range: 8-11). An Essential RWD Table was compiled that contains data elements that are necessary, at a minimal, to conduct an RWE study. An Expanded RWD Table that contains a more comprehensive list of potentially relevant data elements was also compiled and the availabilities of these data elements were mapped. While most provinces have data on patient demographics (e.g., age, sex) and cancer-related variables (e.g., morphology, topography), the availability and linkability of data on cancer treatment, clinical characteristics (e.g., morphology and topography), and drug costs vary among provinces. Based on current resources, data availability, and access processes, data experts in most provinces noted that more than 12 months would be required to complete an RWE study. The CanREValue Collaboration's Data WG identified key data holdings, access considerations, as well as gaps in oncology treatment-specific data. This data catalogue can be used to facilitate future oncology-specific RWE analyses across Canada.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCanadaHumansAntineoplastic Agentsoncologypopulation-basedreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID35323365
PMCPMC8947246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.