Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35323366›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Not All Canadian Cancer Patients Are Equal-Disparities in Public Cancer Drug Funding across Canada.

Ceilidh MacPhail, Stephanie Snow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tackling financial toxicity related to cancer care in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Disparity in public funding of systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  18. Access to Cancer Drugs in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ceilidh MacPhailMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Stephanie SnowMedical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada lacks a national drug insurance plan. The home province or territory of a patient determines which cancer drugs are available on the public formulary, who is eligible for public coverage and what portion of the financial burden of cancer care falls to the individual. This narrative review describes the current interprovincial disparities in access to cancer drugs across Canada. Health technology assessment (HTA) of drugs at a provincial and territory level is a closed process, does not necessarily follow the recommendations of national HTA and leads to further delays in drug access. The public coverage of take-home cancer drugs (THCDs) in Ontario and the Atlantic provinces is often fragmented, unnecessarily complex and a barrier to cancer drug access. Policy solutions to address inter-provincial formulary variation and poor access to THCDs are discussed.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesOntarioAntineoplastic AgentsCanadadrug fundingoncologyuniversal health care

Identifiers

PMID35323366
PMCPMC8947051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.