Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326441›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Cardiac Cachexia: Unaddressed Aspect in Cancer Patients.

Sarama Saha, Praveen Kumar Singh, Partha Roy, Sham S Kakar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardiac wasting in patients with cancer.Basic research in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarama SahaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249203, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7838-9875
Praveen Kumar SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 249203, India.
Partha RoyDepartment of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India.
Sham S KakarDepartment of Physiology and Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INIndian Institute of Technology Roorkee · INUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Current Trends in Stem Cell TherapiesT32HL134644 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI KAKAR, SHAM S., RATAJCZAK, MARIUSZ Z · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
UofL Bridges to Baccalaureate(ULBB)R25GM133328 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI DAVIS, RANDALL, KAKAR, SHAM S. · 2019 to 2023
$732k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM133328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-derived cachectic factors such as proinflammatory cytokines and neuromodulators not only affect skeletal muscle but also affect other organs, including the heart, in the form of cardiac muscle atrophy, fibrosis, and eventual cardiac dysfunction, resulting in poor quality of life and reduced survival. This article reviews the holistic approaches of existing diagnostic, pathophysiological, and multimodal therapeutic interventions targeting the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for cancer-induced cardiac cachexia. The major drivers of cardiac muscle wasting in cancer patients are autophagy activation by the cytokine-NFkB, TGF β-SMAD

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesNeoplasmsCachexiaCytokinesHumansMuscular AtrophyQuality of LifeCytokinesangiotensin IIautophagycancercardiac cachexiachemotherapyproinflammatory cytokineswithaferin A

Identifiers

PMID35326441
PMCPMC8947289
OpenAlexW4220756856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.