Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35326847›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clinical Decision Support Systems for Antibiotic Prescribing: An Inventory of Current French Language Tools.

Claire Durand, Serge Alfandari, Guillaume Béraud, Rosy Tsopra, François-Xavier Lescure, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire DurandInfection Antimicrobials Modelling Evolution (IAME) UMR 1137, University of Paris, French Institute for Medical Research (INSERM), F-75018 Paris, France.
Serge AlfandariInfectious Disease Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, F-59200 Tourcoing, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9672-725X
Guillaume BéraudInfectious Disease Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, F-86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-0916
Rosy TsopraInformation Sciences to Support Personalized Medicine, Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, F-75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-5547
François-Xavier LescureInfection Antimicrobials Modelling Evolution (IAME) UMR 1137, University of Paris, French Institute for Medical Research (INSERM), F-75018 Paris, France.
Nathan Peiffer-SmadjaInfection Antimicrobials Modelling Evolution (IAME) UMR 1137, University of Paris, French Institute for Medical Research (INSERM), F-75018 Paris, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier de Tourcoing · FRInserm · FRInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly being used by clinicians to support antibiotic decision making in infection management. However, coexisting CDSSs often target different types of physicians, infectious situations, and patient profiles. The objective of this study was to perform an up-to-date inventory of French language CDSSs currently used in community and hospital settings for antimicrobial prescribing and to describe their main characteristics. A literature search, a search among smartphone application stores, and an open discussion with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) experts were conducted in order to identify available French language CDSSs. Any clinical decision support tool that provides a personalized recommendation based on a clinical situation and/or a patient was included. Eleven CDSSs were identified through the search strategy. Of the 11 CDSSs, only 2 had been the subject of published studies, while 9 CDSSs were identified through smartphone application stores and expert knowledge. The majority of CDSSs were available free of charge (

Indexed as

antibiotic prescribingantimicrobialsantimicrobial stewardshipCDSSclinical decision support system

Identifiers

PMID35326847
PMCPMC8944435
OpenAlexW4221010065

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.