Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35327064›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Design and Definition of a New Decision Support System Aimed to the Hierarchization of Patients Candidate to Be Admitted to Intensive Care Units.

Manuel Casal-Guisande, Alberto Comesaña-Campos, Jorge Cerqueiro-Pequeño, José-Benito Bouza-Rodríguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel Casal-GuisandeDepartment of Design in Engineering, University of Vigo, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1494-8145
Alberto Comesaña-CamposDepartment of Design in Engineering, University of Vigo, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-8996
Jorge Cerqueiro-PequeñoDepartment of Design in Engineering, University of Vigo, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-595X
José-Benito Bouza-RodríguezDepartment of Design in Engineering, University of Vigo, 36208 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1235-7264
Universidade de Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The triage processes prior to the assignation of healthcare resources in hospitals are some of the decision-making processes that more severely affect patients. This effect gets even worse in health emergency situations and intensive care units (ICUs). Aiming to facilitate the decision-making process, in this work the use of vague fuzzy numbers is proposed, aiming to define a multi-attribute patient hierarchization method to be used in emergency situations at hospital ICUs. The incorporation of fuzzy models allows for modelling the vagueness and uncertainty associated with decision criteria evaluation, with which more efficient support is provided to the decision-making process. After defining the methodology, the effectiveness of this new system for patient hierarchization is shown in a case study. As a consequence of that, it is proved that the integration of decision-support systems into healthcare environments results to be efficient and productive, suggesting that if a part of the decision process is supported by these systems, then the errors associated with wrong interpretations and/or diagnoses might be reduced.

Indexed as

catastrophe medicinehierarchizationintensive care unitmedical decision-makingtriagevague fuzzy set

Identifiers

PMID35327064
PMCPMC8954209
OpenAlexW4221077404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.