ReviewBiomolecules2022
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Formerly Preeclamptic Women for Early Detection of Subclinical Myocardial Abnormalities: A 2022 Update.
Review in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac volumes, function, and arterial stiffness five years after severe preeclampsia: A comparison with sedentary and active controls.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2026Article
- Placental Macrovascular Pattern from Pregnancies with Maternal Hypertensive and Fetal Growth Capacity Complications.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Preeclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction as Risk Factors of Future Maternal Cardiovascular Disease-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a maternal hypertensive disease, complicating 2-8% of all pregnancies. It has been linked to a 2-7-fold increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, later in life. A total of 40% of formerly preeclamptic women develop preclinical heart failure, which may further deteriorate into clinical heart failure. Noninvasive cardiac imaging could assist in the early detection of myocardial abnormalities, especially in the preclinical stage, when these changes are likely to be reversible. Moreover, imaging studies can improve our insights into the relationship between preeclampsia and heart failure and can be used for monitoring. Cardiac ultrasound is used to assess quantitative changes, including the left ventricular cavity volume and wall thickness, myocardial mass, systolic and diastolic function, and strain. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may be of additional diagnostic value to assess diffuse and focal fibrosis and perfusion. After preeclampsia, sustained elevated myocardial mass along with reduced myocardial circumferential and longitudinal strain and decreased diastolic function is reported. These findings are consistent with the early phases of heart failure, referred to as preclinical (asymptomatic) or B-stage heart failure. In this review, we will provide an up-to-date overview of the potential of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in identifying formerly preeclamptic women who are at high risk for developing heart failure. The potential contribution to early cardiac screening of women with a history of preeclampsia and the pros and cons of these imaging modalities are outlined. Finally, recommendations for future research are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.