Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35328575›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

How to Differentiate General Toxicity-Related Endocrine Effects from Endocrine Disruption: Systematic Review of Carbon Disulfide Data.

Nathalie Printemps, Brigitte Le Magueresse-Battistoni, Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja, Catherine Viguié, Cécile Michel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomaterials for biomarker imaging and detection.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie PrintempsRisk Assessment Department, ANSES, 14 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort, France.
Brigitte Le Magueresse-BattistoniUniv-Lyon, CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U1060, INRAé U1397, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7247-4403
Sakina Mhaouty-KodjaSorbonne Université-CNRS, INSERM, Neuroscience Paris Seine-Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, 75005 Paris, France.
Catherine ViguiéToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, 31027 Toulouse, France.
Cécile MichelRisk Assessment Department, ANSES, 14 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701 Maisons-Alfort, France.
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the assessment of the endocrine disrupting (ED) properties of carbon disulfide (CS

Indexed as

Carbon DisulfideEndocrine DisruptorsEndocrine SystemHumansRisk AssessmentThyroid GlandCarbon DisulfideEndocrine Disruptorscarbon disulfidecardiotoxicityendocrine disruptorsneurotoxicitythyroid disruption

Identifiers

PMID35328575
PMCPMC8952789
OpenAlexW4220680869

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.