Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330040›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Determinants of Adherence to a "GRADIOR" Computer-Based Cognitive Training Program in People with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Dementia.

Angie A Diaz Baquero, María V Perea Bartolomé, José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán, Fernando Martínez-Abad, Esther Parra Vidales, Yolanda Bueno Aguado, Henriëtte G van der Roest, Manuel A Franco-Martín

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angie A Diaz BaqueroInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-4480
María V Perea BartoloméBasic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology Department, Salamanca University, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánDepartment of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation, 49001 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-3150
Fernando Martínez-AbadUniversity Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-8198
Esther Parra VidalesIBIP Center for Clinical Care in Mental Health and Aging, INTRAS Foundation, 49024 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-5148
Yolanda Bueno AguadoGradior Department and Cognitive Research, INTRAS Foundation, 47016 Valladolid, Spain.
Henriëtte G van der RoestDepartment on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (TrimbosI Institute), 1013 GM Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-923X
Manuel A Franco-MartínInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-2523
Universidad de Salamanca · ESFundación INTRAS · ESTrimbos Institute · NL

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions 676265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer-based programs have been implemented from a psychosocial approach for the care of people with dementia (PwD). However, several factors may determine adherence of older PwD to this type of treatment. The aim of this paper was to identify the sociodemographic, cognitive, psychological, and physical-health determinants that helped predict adherence or not to a "GRADIOR" computerized cognitive training (CCT) program in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia.

methodThis study was part of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) (ISRCTN: 15742788). However, this study will only focus on the experimental group (

resultsThe adherence model was made up of the Digit Symbol and Arithmetic of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) and Lexical Verbal Fluency (LVF) -R tests. This model had 90% sensitivity, 50% specificity and 75% precision. The goodness-of-fit

conclusionsgood executive functioning in attention, working memory (WM), phonological verbal fluency and cognitive flexibility predicted a greater probability that a person would be adherent.

Indexed as

cognitioncomputer-baseddementiapsychologyrehabilitationsoftware

Identifiers

PMID35330040
PMCPMC8955227
OpenAlexW4220940759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.