Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35330144›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

In Stent Neo-Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications, Prevention, and Therapeutic Approaches.

Annunziata Nusca, Michele Mattia Viscusi, Francesco Piccirillo, Aurelio De Filippis, Antonio Nenna, Cristiano Spadaccio, Francesco Nappi, Camilla Chello, Fabio Mangiacapra, Francesco Grigioni and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Are RNA Therapies a Solid Foundation or a Frontier Yet to Be Conquered?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Towards Neoatherosclerosis: A Porcine Model for Enhanced Device Testing.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Development of a Novel Murine Model of In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annunziata NuscaCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Michele Mattia ViscusiCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Francesco PiccirilloCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Aurelio De FilippisCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Antonio NennaCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4069-6781
Cristiano SpadaccioCardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Francesco NappiCardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, 93200 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-5360
Camilla ChelloCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Fabio MangiacapraCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-0716
Francesco GrigioniCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Massimo ChelloCardiac Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Gian Paolo UssiaCardiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the dramatic improvements of revascularization therapies occurring in the past decades, a relevant percentage of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) still develops stent failure due to neo-atherosclerosis (NA). This histopathological phenomenon following stent implantation represents the substrate for late in-stent restenosis (ISR) and late stent thrombosis (ST), with a significant impact on patient's long-term clinical outcomes. This appears even more remarkable in the setting of drug-eluting stent implantation, where the substantial delay in vascular healing because of the released anti-proliferative agents might increase the occurrence of this complication. Since the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of NA diverge from native atherosclerosis and early ISR, intra-coronary imaging techniques are crucial for its early detection, providing a proper in vivo assessment of both neo-intimal plaque composition and peri-strut structures. Furthermore, different strategies for NA prevention and treatment have been proposed, including tailored pharmacological therapies as well as specific invasive tools. Considering the increasing population undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES), this review aims to provide an updated overview of the most recent evidence regarding NA, discussing pathophysiology, contemporary intravascular imaging techniques, and well-established and experimental invasive and pharmacological treatment strategies.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseasein-stent restenosisneo-atherosclerosisoptical coherence tomographypercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID35330144
PMCPMC8955389

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.