ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Astaxanthin protects against hearing impairment in diabetic rats.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- From nutrition to therapeutics: the diverse inflammopharmacological and biomedical roles of astaxanthin.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Diabetes mellitus and hearing loss.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Review
- Optimized Protocol for Microalgae DNA Staining with SYTO9/SYBR Green I, Based on Flow Cytometry and RSM Methodology: Experimental Design, Impacts and Validation.Methods and protocols · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDiabetes Mellitus (DM) causes an increase in oxidative stress that leads to deterioration in auditory functions. Astaxanthine (AST) is known to have strong antioxidant effects. In this study, the aim is to investigate the effect of AST against hearing loss that is due to DM.
methodsThis study is an experimental animal study. The study was designed in four groups with 8 animals (n = 8) in each group. The groups were as follows; Control Group (CNT), Diabetic Group (DM), AST applied diabetic group (DM+AST), and AST applied non-diabetic group (AST). Streptozotocin was applied in rats to induce DM. AST was administered by oral gavage. Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) tests were performed on several days of the study. At the end of the study, pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were analyzed in cochlear tissue samples, and Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured.
resultsWhen the findings obtained in the ABR and DPOAE tests in the DM group, it was observed that there was a significant deterioration in the hearing sense. This deterioration was not observed in the DM+AST group. In the DM group, GPx, SOD and CAT levels decreased and MDA levels increased in blood and cochlear tissue. Compared to the DM group, it was noted that antioxidant enzyme levels increased and MDA levels decreased in the DM+AST group. Cochlear tissue pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, which increased with DM, were significantly decreased in the DM+AST group.
conclusionEven though the effects of AST were investigated in a diabetic experimental animal model, if this molecule is proven to be effective in diabetic humans, it can be considered an adjunct therapeutic option with its antioxidant effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: The level of evidence of this article is 5. This article is an experimental animal and laboratory study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.