Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35334901›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Effect of Camel Milk on Glucose Homeostasis in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Refat AlKurd, Nivine Hanash, Narmin Khalid, Dana N Abdelrahim, Moien A B Khan, Lana Mahrous, Hadia Radwan, Farah Naja, Mohamed Madkour, Khaled Obaideen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Adding Sodium Diacetate andVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Camel (Biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Refat AlKurdDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, P.O. Box 961343, Amman 11196, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-5200
Nivine HanashCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LM Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7802-9012
Narmin KhalidDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-6253
Dana N AbdelrahimClinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11931, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-7132
Moien A B KhanNutrition Studies Research Group, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-4618
Lana MahrousDepartment of Health Sciences/Track of Clinical Nutrition, College of Health and Rehabilitation, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 12461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-5904
Hadia RadwanDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-2554
Farah NajaDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-3498
Mohamed MadkourDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-9130-4928
Khaled ObaideenSustainable Energy & Power Systems Research Centre, RISE, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-6472-2753
Katia Abu ShihabDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-8816-0997
MoezAlIslam FarisDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-2616
University of Sharjah · AEApplied Science Private University · JOMaastricht University · NLPetra University · JOPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of camel milk (CM) intake on glycemic control in patients with diabetes are controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to summarize the effect of CM intake on glucose homeostasis parameters in patients with both types of diabetes mellitus; T1DM and T2DM. We searched Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCO host, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, ProQuest Medical, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception until the end of November 2021. Relevant RCTs were identified, and the effect size was reported as mean difference (MD) and standard deviation (SD). Parameters of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), fasting serum insulin (FI), insulin resistance (expressed in terms of HOMA-IR), insulin dose (ID) received, serum insulin antibody (IA), and C-peptide (CP) were tested. Out of 4054 collected articles, 14 RCTs (total 663 subjects) were eligible for inclusion. The pooled results obtained using a random-effects model showed a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c levels (MD, −1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): −2.00, −0.48, p < 0.001 heterogeneity (I2) = 94%) and ID received (MD, −16.72, 95% CI: −22.09, −11.35 p < 0.00001, I2 = 90%), with a clear tendency was shown, but non-significant, to decrease FBG (MD, −23.32, 95% CI: −47.33, 0.70, p = 0.06, I2 = 98%) in patients with diabetes who consumed CM in comparison to those on usual care. Conversely, the consumption of CM did not show significant reductions in the rest of the glucose homeostasis parameters. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with T2DM were more beneficially affected by CM intake than those with T1DM in lowering FBG, while patients with T1DM were more beneficially affected by CM intake than those with T2DM in lowering HbA1c. Both fresh and treated (pasteurized/fermented) CM gave similar beneficial effects in lowering HbA1c. Lastly, a relatively superior effect for longer duration on shorter duration (>6 months, ≤6 months, respectively) of CM intake is found in lowering HbA1c. To conclude, long-term consumption of CM by patients with diabetes could be a useful adjuvant therapy alongside classical medications, especially in lowering the required insulin dose and HbA1c. Due to the high heterogeneity observed in the included studies, more controlled trials with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm our results and to control some confounders and interfering factors existing in the analyzed articles.

Indexed as

CamelusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2AnimalsBlood GlucoseHomeostasisHumansMilkRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood GlucoseArabian camelCamelus dromedariescomplementary and alternative medicine (CAM)glucometabolic parametersglycemic controlinsulin resistance

Identifiers

PMID35334901
PMCPMC8954674
OpenAlexW4220658641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.