ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Modeling the Dynamics of Protein-Protein Interfaces, How and Why?
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Depth Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Ligand-Induced Modulations of the HSPA8-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Charge engineering controls cooperative assembly and loading in protein host-guest complexes.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Efficient Design of AffilinInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Characterizing Protein Corona, Nanobiological Interactions, and Advancing Drug Discovery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multiple Chaperone DnaK-FliC Flagellin Interactions are Required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellum Assembly and Indicate a New Function for DnaK.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Mapping Antibody Epitopes by Solution NMR Spectroscopy: Practical Considerations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Rigid crosslinking of the CD3 complex leads to superior T cell stimulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- Ordered Motions in the Nitric-Oxide Dioxygenase Mechanism of Flavohemoglobin and Assorted Globins with Tightly Coupled Reductases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- The World of GPCR dimers - Mapping dopamine receptor DComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein assemblies act as a key component in numerous cellular processes. Their accurate modeling at the atomic level remains a challenge for structural biology. To address this challenge, several docking and a handful of deep learning methodologies focus on modeling protein-protein interfaces. Although the outcome of these methods has been assessed using static reference structures, more and more data point to the fact that the interaction stability and specificity is encoded in the dynamics of these interfaces. Therefore, this dynamics information must be taken into account when modeling and assessing protein interactions at the atomistic scale. Expanding on this, our review initially focuses on the recent computational strategies aiming at investigating protein-protein interfaces in a dynamic fashion using enhanced sampling, multi-scale modeling, and experimental data integration. Then, we discuss how interface dynamics report on the function of protein assemblies in globular complexes, in fuzzy complexes containing intrinsically disordered proteins, as well as in active complexes, where chemical reactions take place across the protein-protein interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.