Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336412›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Reported Outcome Measures in Studies of Real-World Ambulation in People with a Lower Limb Amputation: A Scoping Review.

Mirjam Mellema, Terje Gjøvaag

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sensors for Human Physical Behaviour Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mirjam MellemaDepartment of Mechanical, Electronic and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-6157
Terje GjøvaagDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8886-5532
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 200543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapidly increasing use of wearable technology to monitor free-living ambulatory behavior demands to address to what extent the chosen outcome measures are representative for real-world situations. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the purpose of use of wearable activity monitors in people with a Lower Limb Amputation (LLA) in the real world, to identify the reported outcome measures, and to evaluate to what extent the reported outcome measures capture essential information from real-world ambulation of people with LLA.

methodsThe literature search included a search in three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE) for articles published between January 1999 and January 2022, and a hand-search. RESULTS AND

conclusions98 articles met the inclusion criteria. According to the included studies' main objective, the articles were classified into observational (

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalWalkingHumansLower ExtremityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Reported Outcome Measuresaccelerometeractivity monitorecological validityfree-living environmentwalking activitywearable technology

Identifiers

PMID35336412
PMCPMC8955603
OpenAlexW4221069624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.