Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336734›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Integration of Multimodal Data from Disparate Sources for Identifying Disease Subtypes.

Kaiyue Zhou, Bhagya Shree Kottoori, Seeya Awadhut Munj, Zhewei Zhang, Sorin Draghici, Suzan Arslanturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaiyue ZhouDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-2140
Bhagya Shree KottooriDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Seeya Awadhut MunjDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Zhewei ZhangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Sorin DraghiciDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0786-8377
Suzan ArslanturkDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4554-4373

Funding

National Science Foundation 1948338United States Department of Defense W81XWH-21-1-0570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies over the past decade have generated a wealth of molecular data that can be leveraged to better understand cancer risk, progression, and outcomes. However, understanding the progression risk and differentiating long- and short-term survivors cannot be achieved by analyzing data from a single modality due to the heterogeneity of disease. Using a scientifically developed and tested deep-learning approach that leverages aggregate information collected from multiple repositories with multiple modalities (e.g., mRNA, DNA Methylation, miRNA) could lead to a more accurate and robust prediction of disease progression. Here, we propose an autoencoder based multimodal data fusion system, in which a fusion encoder flexibly integrates collective information available through multiple studies with partially coupled data. Our results on a fully controlled simulation-based study have shown that inferring the missing data through the proposed data fusion pipeline allows a predictor that is superior to other baseline predictors with missing modalities. Results have further shown that short- and long-term survivors of glioblastoma multiforme, acute myeloid leukemia, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be successfully differentiated with an AUC of 0.94, 0.75, and 0.96, respectively.

Indexed as

cancer progressiondeep learningimputationmultimodal data fusion

Identifiers

PMID35336734
PMCPMC8945377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.