Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337282›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

The characteristics and effectiveness of pregnancy yoga interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lisa Corrigan, Patrick Moran, Niamh McGrath, Jessica Eustace-Cook, Deirdre Daly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515222 (Efficacy of Yoga-Based Intervention in Improving Mother-Child Bonding in Maternal Depression - A Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07515222 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Yoga-Based Intervention in Improving Mother-Child Bonding in Maternal Depression - A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical SciencesRan2026 to 2027Enrolled52ConditionsPerinatal Depression, Postpartum Depression, Mother-Infant Bonding DisorderArmsAdd-on Yoga Intervention, Treatment as Usual(Medication Based)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The Impact of Prenatal Yoga on Hip Mobility and Delivery Outcomes.International journal of exercise science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa CorriganSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. licorrig@tcd.ie.
Patrick MoranSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh McGrathSchool of Public Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jessica Eustace-CookLibrary of Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre DalySchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoga is a popular mind-body medicine frequently recommended to pregnant women. Gaps remain in our understanding of the core components of effective pregnancy yoga programmes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the characteristics and effectiveness of pregnancy yoga interventions, incorporating the FITT (frequency, intensity, time/duration and type) principle of exercise prescription.

methodsNine electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, WHOLiS, AMED, ScieLo, ASSIA and Web of Science. Randomised control trials and quasi-experimental studies examining pregnancy yoga interventions were eligible. Covidence was used to screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Outcomes of interest were stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, labour duration, pain management in labour and mode of birth. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Assessment tool was used to assess methodological quality of studies and GRADE criteria (GRADEpro) evaluated quality of the evidence. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

resultsOf 862 citations retrieved, 31 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies with 2217 pregnant women were included for meta-analysis. Pregnancy yoga interventions reduced anxiety (SMD: -0.91; 95% CI: - 1.49 to - 0.33; p = 0.002), depression (SMD: -0.47; 95% CI: - 0.9 to - 0.04, P = 0.03) and perceived stress (SMD: -1.03; 95% CI: - 1.55 to - 0.52; p < 0.001). Yoga interventions also reduced duration of labour (MD = - 117.75; 95% CI - 153.80 to - 81.71, p < 0.001) and, increased odds of normal vaginal birth (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.46-4.56, p < 0.001) and tolerance for pain. The quality of evidence (GRADE criteria) was low to very low for all outcomes. Twelve or more yoga sessions delivered weekly/bi-weekly had a statistically significant impact on mode of birth, while 12 or more yoga sessions of long duration (> 60 min) had a statistically significant impact on perceived stress.

conclusionThe evidence highlights positive effects of pregnancy yoga on anxiety, depression, perceived stress, mode of birth and duration of labour. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42019119916. Registered on 11th January 2019.

Indexed as

YogaAnxietyAnxiety DisordersFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyQuality of LifeFITT principlemeta-analysisPregnancy yogaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35337282
PMCPMC8957136
OpenAlexW4226155342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.