Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338255›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

What's wrong with my experiment?: The impact of hidden variables on neuropsychopharmacology research.

Hanna M Butler-Struben, Amanda C Kentner, Brian C Trainor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Social Housing of Postoperative Animals to Support Animal Welfare.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bedding as a variable affecting fasting blood glucose and vascular physiology in mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. For neuroscience, social history matters.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna M Butler-StrubenAnimal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Amanda C KentnerSchool of Arts & Sciences, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-486X
Brian C TrainorAnimal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. bctrainor@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-5478
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

Supplement: Oxytocin-department circuits of social approach and vigilanceR01MH121829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TRAINOR, BRIAN C · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
The protective role of environmental enrichment on placental mediators of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis dysfunction in a prenatal inflammatory rat modelR15MH114035 · NIMH · MCPHS UNIVERSITY · PI KENTNER, AMANDA · 2018 to 2022
$788k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121829NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH114035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of neuropsychopharmacology relies on behavioral assays to quantify behavioral processes related to mental illness and substance use disorders. Although these assays have been highly informative, sometimes laboratories have unpublished datasets from experiments that "didn't work". Often this is because expected outcomes were not observed in positive or negative control groups. While this can be due to experimenter error, an important alternative is that under-appreciated environmental factors can have a major impact on results. "Hidden variables" such as circadian cycles, husbandry, and social environments are often omitted in methods sections, even though there is a strong body of literature documenting their impact on physiological and behavioral outcomes. Applying this knowledge in a more critical manner could provide behavioral neuroscientists with tools to develop better testing methods, improve the external validity of behavioral techniques, and make better comparisons of experimental data across institutions. Here we review the potential impact of "hidden variables" that are commonly overlooked such as light-dark cycles, transport stress, cage ventilation, and social housing structure. While some of these conditions may not be under direct control of investigators, it does not diminish the potential impact of these variables on experimental results. We provide recommendations to investigators on which variables to report in publications and how to address "hidden variables" that impact their experimental results.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHumansPhotoperiod

Identifiers

PMID35338255
PMCPMC9117327
OpenAlexW4220723280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.