Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35347478›Full record

ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2022

Switching from warfarin to direct-acting oral anticoagulants: it is time to move forward!

Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Juthipong Benjanuwattra, Osama Okasha, Abdallah Almaghraby, Yehia Saleh, Fady Gerges

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmoud AbdelnabiInternal Medicine Department, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA. mahmoud.hassan.abdelnabi@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-9049
Juthipong BenjanuwattraInternal Medicine Department, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Osama OkashaInternal Medicine Department, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Abdallah AlmaghrabyCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Yehia SalehCardiology Department, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Fady GergesDepartment of Cardiovascular Science, Mediclinic Al Jowhara Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Texas Tech University · USAlexandria University · EGHouston Methodist · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), warfarin, have been in routine clinical use for almost 70 years for various cardiovascular conditions. Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as competitive alternatives for VKAs to prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and have become the preferred choice in several clinical indications for anticoagulation. Recent guidelines have limited the use of DOACs to patients with non-valvular AF to reduce the risk of cardioembolic complications and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although emerging evidence is suggestive of its high efficacy, there was a lack of data to support DOACs safety profile in patients with mechanical valve prosthesis, intracardiac thrombi, or other conditions such as cardiac device implantation or catheter ablation. Therefore, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the beneficial effects of using DOACs, instead of VKAs, for various non-guideline-approved indications. This review aimed to discuss the current guideline-approved indications for DOACs, advantages, and limitations of DOACs use in various clinical indications highlighting the potential emerging indications and remaining challenges for DOACs use. Several considerations are in favour of switching from warfarin to DOACs including superior efficacy, better adverse effect profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and they do not require frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Large randomized controlled trials are required to determine the safety and efficacy of their use in various clinical indications.

Indexed as

BleedingDirect-acting oral anticoagulantsThromboembolismVitamin K antagonistsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID35347478
PMCPMC8960500
OpenAlexW4221017706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.