ArticlePerspectives in psychiatric care2022
The impact of psychiatric disorders on caregivers: An integrative predictive model of burden, stigma, and well-being.
Article in Perspectives in psychiatric care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomic Markers in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among Children and Adolescents-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Illness Representations and Quality of Life Among Informal Cancer Caregivers: Examining the Role of Social Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Catatonia in a Possible Case of Moderate Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Exploring causal associations between plasma metabolites and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Internalized stigma and caregiver burden among caregivers of adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a moderated mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Analysing Digital Engagement Patterns: A Machine Learning Investigation into Social Anxiety Among Adolescents with ADHD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Inside the Hospitalization Voyage of Schizophrenia Care: A Single-Center Journey.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Coping Mechanisms during the War in Ukraine: A Cross-Sectional Assessment among Romanian Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Narrative Review on REM Sleep Deprivation: A Promising Non-Pharmaceutical Alternative for Treating Endogenous Depression.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- The impact of psychiatric disorders on caregivers: An integrative predictive model of burden, stigma, and well-being.Perspectives in psychiatric care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study investigates the predictors of caregivers' experienced burden, stigma, and well-being, when looking after family members diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. DESIGN AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 168 caregivers; perceived burden, stigma, well-being, knowledge, illness perception, and medical variables were assessed.
findingsA number of correlates of burden, stigma, and well-being have been identified and are being discussed. The integrative predictive model showed that the caregiver's emotional representation of illness best predicts burden (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), stigma (β = 0.53, p < 0.001) and well-being (β = -0.36, p < 0.001). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our results can enable health professionals to tailor psychosocial interventions addressed to family members of individuals living with a psychiatric condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.