ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
Patients undergoing multiple
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tracer Techniques in Ophthalmology: Ocular Applications and Systemic Connections.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging in pulmonary fibrosis: pathophysiology, clinical utility, and emerging theranostic applications.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Cumulative radiation exposure from multimodality recurrent imaging of CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, and nuclear medicine.European radiology · 2024Article
- Cumulative radiation exposure from radiological imaging in patients with Hodgkin and diffuse large b-cell lymphoma not submitted to radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Organ dose calculator for diagnostic nuclear medicine patients based on the ICRP reference voxel phantoms and biokinetic models.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the frequency, demographics, primary disease and cumulative effective dose of patients undergoing two or more
methodsIn a retrospective study performed at a tertiary-care hospital, patients who underwent ≥2
results10,714
conclusionsA sizeable number of patients undergo≥2 ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The study found that one of five patients had≥2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.