Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35348613›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Probing RNA structures and functions by solvent accessibility: an overview from experimental and computational perspectives.

Md Solayman, Thomas Litfin, Jaswinder Singh, Kuldip Paliwal, Yaoqi Zhou, Jian Zhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. RNA Structure Analysis by Chemical Probing with DMS and CMCT.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md SolaymanInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Parklands Dr. Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-5211
Thomas LitfinInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Parklands Dr. Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
Jaswinder SinghSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-5533
Kuldip PaliwalSignal Processing Laboratory, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
Yaoqi ZhouInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Parklands Dr. Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
Jian ZhanInstitute for Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing RNA structures and functions have mostly been focused on 2D, secondary and 3D, tertiary structures. Recent advances in experimental and computational techniques for probing or predicting RNA solvent accessibility make this 1D representation of tertiary structures an increasingly attractive feature to explore. Here, we provide a survey of these recent developments, which indicate the emergence of solvent accessibility as a simple 1D property, adding to secondary and tertiary structures for investigating complex structure-function relations of RNAs.

Indexed as

RNANucleic Acid ConformationSolventsRNASolventsprobingRNARNA–protein interactionsSASAsolvent accessibility

Identifiers

PMID35348613
PMCPMC9116373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.