ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022
A method for evaluating drug penetration and absorption through isolated buccal mucosa with highly accuracy and reproducibility.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Oral Epithelial Ex Vivo Organ Culture Model for Biocompatibility and Permeability Assessment of Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Oral Mucosa Models to Evaluate Drug Permeability.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- In vitro and ex vivo models of the oral mucosa as platforms for the validation of novel drug delivery systems.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the project is to establish a standardized operation method of the in vitro permeability model to maximize mucosal integrity and viability. The model drug lidocaine permeability, 20 kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, H&E staining, and mucosal viability were used as evaluation indicators. Firstly, the buccal mucosae of rats, rabbits, dogs, porcine, and humans were analyzed by H&E staining and morphometric analysis to compare the differences. Then, we studied a series of operation methods of isolated mucosa. The buccal mucosae were found to retain their integrity in Kreb's bicarbonate ringer solution at 4 °C for 36 h. Under the long-term storage method with program cooling, freezing at -80 °C, thawing at 37 °C, and using cryoprotectants of 20% glycerol and 20% trehalose, mucosal integrity and biological viability can be maintained for 21 days. The heat separation method was used to prepare a permeability model with a mucosal thickness of 500 μm, which was considered to be the optimal operation. In summary, this study provided an experimental basis for the selection and operation of in vitro penetration models, standardized the research process of isolated mucosa, and improved the accuracy of permeability studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.