Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35352304›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

A transformative mission for prioritising nature in Australian cities.

Niki Frantzeskaki, Cathy Oke, Guy Barnett, Sarah Bekessy, Judy Bush, James Fitzsimons, Maria Ignatieva, Dave Kendal, Jonathan Kingsley, Laura Mumaw and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Niki FrantzeskakiDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.frantzeskaki@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6983-448X
Cathy OkeConnected Cities Lab, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2327-4867
Guy BarnettCSIRO Land and Water, Clunies Ross Street, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-9427
Sarah BekessyICON Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-1979
Judy BushFaculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7847-6610
James FitzsimonsThe Nature Conservancy, Suite 2-01, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-8040
Maria IgnatievaSchool of Design, the University of Western Australia, M433, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.
Dave KendalHealthy Landscapes Research Group, School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Jonathan KingsleyCentre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-7164
Laura MumawCentre for Urban Research, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-8482
Alessandro OssolaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0507-6026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia is experiencing mounting pressures related to processes of urbanisation, biodiversity loss and climate change felt at large in cities. At the same time, it is cities that can take the leading role in pioneering approaches and solutions to respond to those coupling emergencies. In this perspective piece we respond to the following question: What are the required transformations for prioritising, valuing, maintaining and embracing nature in cities in Australia? We adopt the mission framework as an organising framework to present proposed pathways to transform Australian cities as nature-positive places of the future. We propose three interconnected pathways as starting actions to steer urban planning, policy and governance in Australian cities: First, cities need to establish evidence-based planning for nature in cities and mainstream new planning tools that safeguard and foreground urban nature. Second, collaborative planning needs to become a standard practice in cities and inclusive governance for nature in cities needs to prioritise Aboriginal knowledge systems and practices as well as look beyond what local governments can do. Third, for progressing to nature-positive cities, it is paramount to empower communities to innovate with nature across Australian cities. Whilst we focus on Australian cities, the lessons and pathways are broadly applicably globally and can inspire science-policy debates for the post COP15 biodiversity and COP26 climate change implementation processes.

Indexed as

City PlanningUrbanizationAustraliaCitiesClimate ChangeIndigenous knowledgeMetropolitanNature-based solutionsPlanningPolicyUrban

Identifiers

PMID35352304
PMCPMC8963402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.