Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355337›Full record

ArticlePhytotherapy research : PTR2022

The naturally-derived alkaloids as a potential treatment for COVID-19: A scoping review.

Bárbara Longhini Gonzalez, Natalia Castelhano de Oliveira, Mariane Roberta Ritter, Fernanda Stumpf Tonin, Eduardo Borges Melo, Andréia Cristina Conegero Sanches, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Marcus Vinícius Petruco, João Carlos Palazzo de Mello, Danielly Chierrito and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Absolute Configuration of 12Journal of natural products · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bárbara Longhini GonzalezCentro Universitário Ingá-UNINGÁ, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Natalia Castelhano de OliveiraDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Mariane Roberta RitterDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernanda Stumpf ToninPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Paraná-UFPR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Eduardo Borges MeloCentro de Ciências Médicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná-UNIOESTE, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
Andréia Cristina Conegero SanchesCentro de Ciências Médicas e Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná-UNIOESTE, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosDepartamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Marcus Vinícius PetrucoHospital Santa Rita, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
João Carlos Palazzo de MelloDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7532-3395
Danielly ChierritoDepartamento de Farmácia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Daniela Cristina de Medeiros AraújoCentro Universitário Ingá-UNINGÁ, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-035X
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRHospital Santa Paula · BRUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has a high mortality rate and transmissibility. In this context, medicinal plants have attracted attention due to the wide availability and variety of therapeutic compounds, such as alkaloids, a vast class with several proven pharmacological effects, like the antiviral and anti-inflammatory activities. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to summarize the current knowledge of the potential applicability of alkaloids for treating COVID-19. A systematic search was performed on PubMed and Scopus, from database inception to August 2021. Among the 63 eligible studies, 65.07% were in silico model, 20.63% in vitro and 14.28% clinical trials and observational studies. According to the in silico assessments, the alkaloids 10-hydroxyusambarensine, cryptospirolepine, crambescidin 826, deoxynortryptoquivaline, ergotamine, michellamine B, nigellidine, norboldine and quinadoline B showed higher binding energy with more than two target proteins. The remaining studies showed potential use of berberine, cephaeline, emetine, homoharringtonine, lycorine, narciclasine, quinine, papaverine and colchicine. The possible ability of alkaloids to inhibit protein targets and to reduce inflammatory markers show the potential for development of new treatment strategies against COVID-19. However, more high quality analyses/reviews in this field are necessary to firmly establish the effectiveness/safety of the alkaloids here described.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsHumansSARS-CoV-2AlkaloidsAntiviral Agentsalkaloidscoronavirusmedicinal plantnatural productSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35355337
PMCPMC9111026
OpenAlexW4220845441

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.