Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355705›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Treatment Strategy for Patients with HR-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Progressed on CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Shouko Hayama, Rikiya Nakamura, Toshiko Miyaki, Makiko Itami, Naohito Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shouko HayamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Rikiya NakamuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Toshiko MiyakiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Makiko ItamiDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Naohito YamamotoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The study aim was to evaluate if mTOR inhibitors can be considered as a treatment option for HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinicopathological data of patients with HR+ HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and subsequent therapies at our institution between 2014 and 2020. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of subsequent treatment: (A) exemestane plus everolimus, (B) endocrine monotherapy, and (C) chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. The efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of each subsequent treatment were assessed by using Fisher's exact tests. Results: Eighty-six patients (34 in group A, 20 in group B, 32 in group C) were included. The most common endocrine therapy in group B was fulvestrant (40%). The major chemotherapy regimen in group C was eribulin (25%). The median OS times after stopping CDK4/6 inhibitors were 34.5 months (95% confidence interval, 17.2 to NA), 13.6 months (3.9 to NA), and 19.5 months (18.8 to NA) in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. The only significant difference in OS was observed between group A and group B (20.9 months; Conclusion: Our study shows that mTOR inhibitors might be an effective treatment option for patients with HR+ HER2- MBC previously treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Indexed as

CDK4/6 inhibitorsEndocrine therapyMetastatic breast cancermTOR inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35355705
PMCPMC8914266

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.