Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356849›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

Current methods for developing predictive energy equations in maintenance dialysis are imprecise.

Alainn Bailey, Rebecca Brody, Joachim Sackey, J Scott Parrott, Emily Peters, Laura Byham-Gray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Alainn BaileyDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rebecca BrodyDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Joachim SackeyDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
J Scott ParrottDepartment of Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Emily PetersDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Laura Byham-GrayDepartment of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USNutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Development and Validation of a Predictive Energy Equation in HemodialysisR15DK090593 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MED/ DENT OF NJ-SCH/HLTH REL PRO · PI BYHAM-GRAY, LAURA DIANE · 2012 to 2013
$495k
Patient-Centered Approach to Exploring Protein-Energy Wasting in DialysisK18HS023434 · AHRQ · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI BYHAM-GRAY, LAURA DIANE · 2015 to 2016
$417k
AHRQ HHS K18 HS023434NIDDK NIH HHS R15 DK090593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor individuals receiving maintenance dialysis, estimating accurate resting energy expenditure (REE) is essential for achieving energy balance, and preventing protein-energy wasting. Dialysis-specific, predictive energy equations (PEEs) offer a practical way to calculate REE. Three PEEs have been formulated

methodsThis analysis comprised of 113 individuals from the Rutgers Nutrition and Kidney Database. Estimated REE (eREE) was calculated for each PEE, and agreement with mREE was set at > 50% of values within the limits of ±10%. Reliability and accuracy were determined using intraclass correlation (ICC) and a Bland Altman plot, which analysed the percentage difference of eREE form mREE.

resultsParticipants were 58.4% male and 81.4% African American. Mean age was 55.8 ± 12.2 years, and the median BMI was 28.9 (IQR = 25.3 - 34.4) kg/m

conclusionDialysis-specific energy equations showed variable accuracy. When categorized by BMI, the equations performed poorly at the extremes, where individuals are most vulnerable. Innovation is needed to understand these variances and correct the imprecision in PEEs for clinical practice.KEY MESSAGESPotentially impacting over millions of patients worldwide, our long-term goal is to understand energy expenditure (EE) across the spectrum of CKD (stages 1-5) in adults and children being treated with dialysis or transplantation, with the intent of providing tools for the health professional that will improve the delivery of quality care.Our research has identified and focussed on disease-specific factors which account for 60% of the variance in predicting EE in patients on MHD, but significant gaps remain.Thus, our central hypotheses are that (1) there are unique disease-specific determinants of EE and (2) prediction of EE for individuals diagnosed with CKD can be vastly improved with a model that combines these factors with more sophisticated approaches.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismRenal DialysisAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCalorimetry, IndirectChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultschronic kidney diseasedialysishaemodialysispredictive equationResting energy expenditure

Identifiers

PMID35356849
PMCPMC8979515
OpenAlexW4220809255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.