Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357283›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2022

What makes interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours successful in the secondary school environment? A systematic review of systematic reviews.

T E Capper, S F Brennan, J V Woodside, M C McKinley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global parent perspectives on school food service internationally: A mixed papers narrative review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T E CapperCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK.
S F BrennanCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK.
J V WoodsideCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK.
M C McKinleyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Grosvenor Road, BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S03756X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review evidence from systematic reviews of interventions to improve dietary behaviours and reduce food wastage in secondary school pupils.

designCINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews of school-based dietary interventions from 2000 to 2020 published in a peer-reviewed journal in English. Articles were reviewed independently by two authors. AMSTAR-2 was used for quality assessment.

settingSecondary school dietary interventions.

participantsAdolescents (aged 11-18).

resultsIn total, thirteen systematic reviews of dietary interventions in secondary schools met the inclusion criteria. A number of key characteristics of interventions that contributed to improvements in food choices in secondary school pupils were identified. These included the combination of education and environmental restructuring, incorporation of computer-based feedback, media or messaging, peer and/or parent involvement, an increase in the availability of healthy foods and the use of behavioural theory as a basis to the intervention. Intervention components that contributed specifically to a reduction in sugar-sweetened beverage intake or an increase in fruit and vegetable consumption, which are particularly relevant to adolescents, could not be determined. Similarly, evidence for interventions that improve nutritional knowledge and attitudes was limited.

conclusionsThis systematic review of systematic reviews has identified a number of components of dietary interventions that can be explored to improve dietary behaviours in secondary school environments and, if demonstrated to be effective, be considered for inclusion in policies and strategies to improve the school food environment and promote dietary change.

Indexed as

DietSchoolsAdolescentFruitHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicVegetablesAdolescenceDietFood choiceSecondary schoolsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35357283
PMCPMC9991643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.