Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357312›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2022

Open-source Web Portal for Managing Self-reported Data and Real-world Data Donation in Diabetes Research: Platform Feasibility Study.

Drew Cooper, Tebbe Ubben, Christine Knoll, Hanne Ballhausen, Shane O'Donnell, Katarina Braune, Dana Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Drew CooperDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3847-8416
Tebbe UbbenDedoc Labs GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2573-2198
Christine KnollDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-3365
Hanne BallhausenDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4530-7669
Shane O'DonnellSchool of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3778-705X
Katarina BrauneDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-245X
Dana LewisOpenAPS, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-6308
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with diabetes and their support networks have developed open-source automated insulin delivery systems to help manage their diabetes therapy, as well as to improve their quality of life and glycemic outcomes. Under the hashtag #WeAreNotWaiting, a wealth of knowledge and real-world data have been generated by users of these systems but have been left largely untapped by research; opportunities for such multimodal studies remain open.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility of several aspects of open-source automated insulin delivery systems including challenges related to data management and security across multiple disparate web-based platforms and challenges related to implementing follow-up studies.

methodsWe developed a mixed methods study to collect questionnaire responses and anonymized diabetes data donated by participants-which included adults and children with diabetes and their partners or caregivers recruited through multiple diabetes online communities. We managed both front-end participant interactions and back-end data management with our web portal (called the Gateway). Participant questionnaire data from electronic data capture (REDCap) and personal device data aggregation (Open Humans) platforms were pseudonymously and securely linked and stored within a custom-built database that used both open-source and commercial software. Participants were later given the option to include their health care providers in the study to validate their questionnaire responses; the database architecture was designed specifically with this kind of extensibility in mind.

resultsOf 1052 visitors to the study landing page, 930 participated and completed at least one questionnaire. After the implementation of health care professional validation of self-reported clinical outcomes to the study, an additional 164 individuals visited the landing page, with 142 completing at least one questionnaire. Of the optional study elements, 7 participant-health care professional dyads participated in the survey, and 97 participants who completed the survey donated their anonymized medical device data.

conclusionsThe platform was accessible to participants while maintaining compliance with data regulations. The Gateway formalized a system of automated data matching between multiple data sets, which was a major benefit to researchers. Scalability of the platform was demonstrated with the later addition of self-reported data validation. This study demonstrated the feasibility of custom software solutions in addressing complex study designs. The Gateway portal code has been made available open-source and can be leveraged by other research groups.

Indexed as

automated insulin deliverydiabetesdiabetes technologydigital healthinsulinmixed methodsopen-sourcepatient-reported outcomesreal-world dataresearch methodstype 1 diabetesweb portal

Identifiers

PMID35357312
PMCPMC9015748
OpenAlexW4206460926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.