ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023
Incidental vascular findings on brain magnetic resonance angiography.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Narrower jugular bulbs and their tributaries are associated with skull base venous hyperintensity on arterial spin-labeling MRI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-centric AI Model for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Detection and Volumetric Segmentation in 3D TOF-MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic protocol to identify 'clinical controls' for paediatric neuroimaging research from clinically acquired brain MRIs.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A systematic protocol to identify "clinical controls" for pediatric neuroimaging research from clinically acquired brain MRIs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Gene Commonality in Arterial Circuits Throughout the Body.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Incidental imaging findings from head to toe: challenges and management: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the ever-increasing utilization of magnetic resonance angiography, incidental vascular findings are increasingly discovered on exams performed for unconnected indications. Some incidental lesions represent pathology and require further intervention and surveillance, such as aneurysm, certain vascular malformations, and arterial stenoses or occlusions. Others are benign or represent normal anatomic variation, and may warrant description, but not further work-up. This review describes the most commonly encountered incidental findings on magnetic resonance angiography, their prevalence, clinical implications, and any available management recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.