Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35359882›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Healthy longevity2022

Hybrid closed-loop glucose control compared with sensor augmented pump therapy in older adults with type 1 diabetes: an open-label multicentre, multinational, randomised, crossover study.

Charlotte K Boughton, Sara Hartnell, Hood Thabit, Womba M Mubita, Katharine Draxlbauer, Tina Poettler, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Korey K Hood, Julia K Mader, Parth Narendran and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04025762 (An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 16 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Sensor Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04025762 nacompletednot on this map

An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomised, Two-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Utility of 16 Week Day and Night Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control Under Free Living Conditions Compared to Sensor Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CambridgeRan2019 to 2021Enrolled38ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypoglycemia, ArrythmiaArmsHybrid closed-loop system (CamAPS FX), Sensor augmented pump therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Real-World Evidence of Automated Insulin Delivery System Use.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Inpatient Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlotte K BoughtonWellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Sara HartnellCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge, UK.
Hood ThabitDiabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Womba M MubitaDiabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Katharine DraxlbauerUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Tina PoettlerDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Malgorzata E WilinskaWellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Korey K HoodDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, CA, USA.
Julia K MaderDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Parth NarendranUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lalantha LeelarathnaDiabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Mark L EvansWellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Roman HovorkaWellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBStanford University · US

Funding

24/7 closed-loop in older subjects with type 1 diabetesDP3DK112176 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE · PI HOVORKA, ROMAN · 2016 to 2016
$1.9M
Medical Research Council MR/T023899/1NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK112176Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults with type 1 diabetes have distinct characteristics that can make optimising glycaemic control challenging. We sought to test our hypothesis that hybrid closed-loop glucose control is safe and more effective than sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in older adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: In an open-label, multicentre, multinational (UK and Austria), randomised, crossover study, adults aged 60 years and older with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy underwent two 16-week periods comparing hybrid closed-loop (CamAPS FX, CamDiab, Cambridge, UK) and SAP therapy in random order. Block randomisation by means of central randomisation software to one of two treatment sequences was stratified by centre. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time sensor glucose was in target range between 3·9 and 10·0 mmol/L. Analysis for the primary endpoint and adverse events was by intention-to-treat. The study has completed and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04025762. Findings: 38 participants were enrolled. One participant withdrew during run-in because of difficulties with the study pump infusion sets. 37 participants (median [IQR] age 68 [63-70] years, mean [SD] baseline glycated haemoglobin [HbA Interpretation: Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery is safe and achieves superior glycaemic control to SAP therapy in older adults with long duration of type 1 diabetes. Importantly this was achieved without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in this population with risk factors for severe hypoglycaemia. This suggests that hybrid closed-loop therapy is a clinically important treatment option for older adults with type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1HypoglycemiaAgedBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID35359882
PMCPMC8967297
OpenAlexW4221125458

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.