Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362109›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2022

Heart Team risk assessment with angiography-derived fractional flow reserve determining the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease: Trial design and rationale for the DECISION QFR randomized trial.

Kotaro Miyata, Taku Asano, Akira Saito, Kohei Abe, Toru Tanigaki, Masahiro Hoshino, Tomoaki Kobayashi, Yoshimitsu Takaoka, Takayoshi Kanie, Manabu Yamasaki and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for Heart Team decision-making in multivessel disease: the randomised, multicentre DECISION QFR trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Kotaro MiyataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku AsanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-3381
Akira SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei AbeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru TanigakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan.
Masahiro HoshinoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tomoaki KobayashiDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshimitsu TakaokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayoshi KanieDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-0671
Manabu YamasakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiko YoshinoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki WakabayashiDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki OuchiDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KodamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yumi ShiinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Rihito TamakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke NishihataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keita MasudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro SuzukiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideaki NonakaDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki EmoriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuki KatagiriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yosuke MiyazakiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yohei SotomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Motoki YasunagaDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Norihiro KogameDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoichi KuramitsuDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Johan H C ReiberDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Takayuki OkamuraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yoshiharu HiguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tsunekazu KakutaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroyasu MisumiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki KomiyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi MatsuoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan.
Kengo TanabeDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
DECISION QFR investigators
St. Luke's International Hospital · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPGifu Heart Center · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPTsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital · JPYamaguchi University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPLeiden University Medical Center · NLSapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPToho University · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

Japanese National Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 19K17617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Assessmentdecision-makingfunctional SYNTAX scoreHeart Teamquantitative flow ratioSYNTAX score II 2020

Identifiers

PMID35362109
PMCPMC9175249
OpenAlexW4220824406

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.