Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35362845›Full record

ReviewCognitive research: principles and implications2022

A three-factor benefits framework for understanding consumer preference for scented household products: psychological interactions and implications for future development.

Rachel S Herz, Maria Larsson, Rafael Trujillo, Marisa C Casola, Farah K Ahmed, Stacy Lipe, Morgan E Brashear

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel S HerzDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University Medical School, 146 Thayer St., Providence, RI, 02912, USA. rachel_herz@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6259-8568
Maria LarssonDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rafael TrujilloThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Marisa C CasolaThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Farah K AhmedFragrance Creators Association, Arlington, VA, USA.
Stacy LipeThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Morgan E BrashearThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have deliberately scented their environment for purpose or pleasure for millennia. In the contemporary marketplace most consumers prefer and purchase scented versions of common household products. However, the drivers of this consumer preference have not been elucidated. To explain the attraction to scent in household products we propose a novel three-factor framework, comprising functional benefits (malodor mitigation, base odor coverage, freshening), in-use experience benefits (cleanliness, efficacy, pleasure), and emotional benefits (increasing in confidence, mood and nostalgia). To support this framework, we present new data from a market research survey on US consumer purchasing habits and attitudes towards home cleaning, laundry, and air freshening products. Further substantiating our framework, a focused review of olfactory psychological science illustrating the central role of scent in cognition, wellbeing, motivated behavior, and social behavior, as well as sensory marketing research highlights the benefits and implications of scent in consumer household products. Based on our three-factor framework we go on to discuss the potential for scent to influence health and raise issues to consider (such as potential negative responding to fragranced products). We conclude by showcasing new opportunities for future research in olfactory science and on scented household products that can advance the positive impacts of scent.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHousehold ProductsAttitudeHumansMarketingOdorantsCognitionConfidenceConsumer behaviourCross-modal interactionsEmotionHealthHousehold consumer productsMemoryMotivated behaviourOlfactionPerceptionQuality of lifeScentScent marketingSensory marketingSocial behaviourThree-factor framework

Identifiers

PMID35362845
PMCPMC8972642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.