Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35366756›Full record

ReviewCell stress & chaperones2022

Neutralizing the free radicals could alleviate the disease severity following an infection by positive strand RNA viruses.

Agieshkumar Balakrishna Pillai, Aashika Raagavi JeanPierre, Vignesh Mariappan, Pajanivel Ranganadin, Rao S R

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell stress & chaperones, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agieshkumar Balakrishna PillaiCentral Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), School of Biological Sciences, MGM Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Puducherry, 607 402, India. agiesh.b@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6543-2977
Aashika Raagavi JeanPierreCentral Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), School of Biological Sciences, MGM Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Puducherry, 607 402, India.
Vignesh MariappanCentral Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), School of Biological Sciences, MGM Advanced Research Institute (MGMARI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Puducherry, 607 402, India.
Pajanivel RanganadinMahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute (MGMCRI), Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Puducherry, 607 402, India.
Rao S RResearch, Innovation & Development, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Puducherry, 607 402, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free radical release due to oxidative stress is gaining importance in the field of viral pathogenesis. Recent studies suggest the involvement of oxidative stress and ROS levels in regulating disease virulence during RNA virus infection. Most of the RNA virus infections lead to vascular dysfunction and disease severity. However, the biology of free radicals in maintaining vascular endothelium integrity is not completely understood. In the present review, we discuss some of the common features in positive-strand RNA virus infections such as dengue and SARS-CoV-2 and suggest that anti-oxidant therapy could pave the way to develop therapeutic strategies in combating emerging and re-emerging RNA viruses.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Free RadicalsHumansPositive-Strand RNA VirusesSeverity of Illness IndexFree RadicalsAnti-oxidant therapyCOVID-19Endothelial activationRNA virusROS

Identifiers

PMID35366756
PMCPMC8976658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.