Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35367964›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Exploring Network Properties Across Preclinical Stages of Alzheimer's Disease Using a Visual Short-Term Memory and Attention Task with High-Density Electroencephalography: A Brain-Connectome Neurophysiological Study.

Ioulietta Lazarou, Kostas Georgiadis, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Vangelis P Oikonomou, Thanos G Stavropoulos, Anthoula Tsolaki, Ioannis Kompatsiaris, Magda Tsolaki, RADAR-AD Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ioulietta LazarouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kostas GeorgiadisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Spiros NikolopoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vangelis P OikonomouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thanos G StavropoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anthoula TsolakiInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis KompatsiarisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Magda TsolakiInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH-ITI), Thessaloniki, Greece.
RADAR-AD Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual short-term memory (VSTMT) and visual attention (VAT) exhibit decline in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum; however, network disruption in preclinical stages is scarcely explored.

objectiveTo advance our knowledge about brain networks in AD and discover connectivity alterations during VSTMT and VAT.

methodsTwelve participants with AD, 23 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 17 with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and 21 healthy controls (HC) were examined using a neuropsychological battery at baseline and follow-up (three years). At baseline, the subjects were examined using high density electroencephalography while performing a VSTMT and VAT. For exploring network organization, we constructed weighted undirected networks and examined clustering coefficient, strength, and betweenness centrality from occipito-parietal regions.

resultsOne-way ANOVA and pair-wise t-test comparisons showed statistically significant differences in HC compared to SCD (t (36) = 2.43, p = 0.026), MCI (t (42) = 2.34, p = 0.024), and AD group (t (31) = 3.58, p = 0.001) in Clustering Coefficient. Also with regards to Strength, higher values for HC compared to SCD (t (36) = 2.45, p = 0.019), MCI (t (42) = 2.41, p = 0.020), and AD group (t (31) = 3.58, p = 0.001) were found. Follow-up neuropsychological assessment revealed converge of 65% of the SCD group to MCI. Moreover, SCD who were converted to MCI showed significant lower values in all network metrics compared to the SCD that remained stable.

conclusionThe present findings reveal that SCD exhibits network disorganization during visual encoding and retrieval with intermediate values between MCI and HC.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionConnectomeBrainElectroencephalographyHumansMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseasebrain networkselectroencephalographymild cognitive impairmentsubjective cognitive declinevisual attentionvisual short-term memory

Identifiers

PMID35367964
PMCPMC9661343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.