Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35373189›Full record

ArticleEndocrines2021

Patient Perspectives on Use of Video Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Stephanie S Crossen, Crystal C Romero, Lindsey A Loomba, Nicole S Glaser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Institutional Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Telemedicine for Type 1 Diabetes Care.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Challenges and Opportunities in Using Telehealth for Diabetes Care.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie S CrossenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-6898
Crystal C RomeroDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Lindsey A LoombaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Nicole S GlaserDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Planning for a Cohort Study on Neurocognitive Complication of Type 1 Diabetes in ChildrenU34DK123894 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GHETTI, SIMONA, GLASER, NICOLE S · 2019 to 2020
$719k
Use of connected health technology to optimize outcomes for high risk pediatric patients with type 1 diabetesK23DK125671 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CROSSEN, STEPHANIE · 2020 to 2023
$649k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK125671NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK123894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread adoption of telemedicine for management of chronic conditions such as type 1 diabetes (T1D), but few data have been collected about the patient experience and perceived quality of care during this time. We surveyed members of the T1D Exchange patient registry and online community regarding their experiences with and opinions about telemedicine care during the pandemic. Among 2235 survey respondents, 65% had utilized telemedicine. The most common reasons for adopting telemedicine were providers not offering in-person care (66%), concerns about the health risks of in-person care (59%), providers offering (52%) or insurance covering (19%) telemedicine for the first time, and local or state orders to stay home (33%). Among telemedicine users, 62% felt video care was as effective as or more effective than in-person care, and 82% hoped to use telemedicine in the future. The most-cited reason for non-use of telemedicine was that providers were not offering it (49%). Our findings highlight the role of telemedicine in maintaining access to T1D care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents' satisfaction with telemedicine and interest in its continued use signifies the need for ongoing access to this care modality and for the development of telemedicine best practices within T1D care.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicpatient-centered caretelemedicinetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35373189
PMCPMC8975132
OpenAlexW3208013534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.