SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022
Deep Learning in mHealth for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Cancer: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of digital health technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in COPD: systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Technologies in the Context of Cardiovascular Prevention From Early Detection to Cardiac Recovery: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning-based mortality prediction in critically ill patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease: a radiomics and clinical data integration study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of machine learning and deep learning models for heart disease prediction in a small clinical dataset.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Article
- AI modeling photoplethysmography to electrocardiography useful for predicting cardiovascular disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Role of Mobile Health and Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in AI-Driven Cardiovascular Imaging for Fairer Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Data Preprocessing Techniques for AI and Machine Learning Readiness: Scoping Review of Wearable Sensor Data in Cancer Care.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
- Privacy and Consent in Mobile Health: Solutions for Balancing Benefits and Risks.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Technological Advances in SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Predicting hypertension control using machine learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Prediction of Different Risk Factors in Relation to Hyperlipidemia Using Framingham Risk Score and Cholesterol Risk Score in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Article
- Using a Hybrid Neural Network and a Regularized Extreme Learning Machine for Human Activity Recognition with Smartphone and Smartwatch.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Decentralized Marketplace for Patient-Generated Health Data: Design Science Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Machine learning models for predicting survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and cancer impose a significant burden on people and health care systems around the globe. Recently, deep learning (DL) has shown great potential for the development of intelligent mobile health (mHealth) interventions for chronic diseases that could revolutionize the delivery of health care anytime, anywhere.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to present a systematic review of studies that have used DL based on mHealth data for the diagnosis, prognosis, management, and treatment of major chronic diseases and advance our understanding of the progress made in this rapidly developing field.
methodsA search was conducted on the bibliographic databases Scopus and PubMed to identify papers with a focus on the deployment of DL algorithms that used data captured from mobile devices (eg, smartphones, smartwatches, and other wearable devices) targeting CVD, diabetes, or cancer. The identified studies were synthesized according to the target disease, the number of enrolled participants and their age, and the study period as well as the DL algorithm used, the main DL outcome, the data set used, the features selected, and the achieved performance.
resultsIn total, 20 studies were included in the review. A total of 35% (7/20) of DL studies targeted CVD, 45% (9/20) of studies targeted diabetes, and 20% (4/20) of studies targeted cancer. The most common DL outcome was the diagnosis of the patient's condition for the CVD studies, prediction of blood glucose levels for the studies in diabetes, and early detection of cancer. Most of the DL algorithms used were convolutional neural networks in studies on CVD and cancer and recurrent neural networks in studies on diabetes. The performance of DL was found overall to be satisfactory, reaching >84% accuracy in most studies. In comparison with classic machine learning approaches, DL was found to achieve better performance in almost all studies that reported such comparison outcomes. Most of the studies did not provide details on the explainability of DL outcomes.
conclusionsThe use of DL can facilitate the diagnosis, management, and treatment of major chronic diseases by harnessing mHealth data. Prospective studies are now required to demonstrate the value of applied DL in real-life mHealth tools and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.