Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35378665›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2022

Impact of Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring in Cerebrovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.

Mais Al-Kawaz, Sung-Min Cho, Rebecca F Gottesman, Jose I Suarez, Lucia Rivera-Lara

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mais Al-KawazDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Mais.Al-Kawaz@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-8012
Sung-Min ChoDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebecca F GottesmanStroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jose I SuarezDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lucia Rivera-LaraDivision of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) prevents brain injury by maintaining a relatively constant cerebral blood flow despite fluctuations in cerebral perfusion pressure. This process is disrupted consequent to various neurologic pathologic processes, which may result in worsening neurologic outcomes. Herein, we aim to highlight evidence describing CA changes and the impact of CA monitoring in patients with cerebrovascular disease, including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The study was preformed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. English language publications were identified through a systematic literature conducted in Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases. The search spanned the dates of each database's inception through January 2021. We selected case-control studies, cohort observational studies, and randomized clinical trials for adult patients (≥ 18 years) who were monitored with continuous metrics using transcranial Doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy, and intracranial pressure monitors. Of 2799 records screened, 48 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 23 studies on ischemic stroke, 18 studies on aSAH, 5 studies on ICH, and 2 studies on systemic hypertension. CA impairment was reported after ischemic stroke but generally improved after tissue plasminogen activator administration and successful mechanical thrombectomy. Persistent impairment in CA was associated with hemorrhagic transformation, malignant cerebral edema, and need for hemicraniectomy. Studies that investigated large ICHs described bilateral CA impairment up to 12 days from the ictus, especially in the presence of small vessel disease. In aSAH, impairment of CA was associated with angiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and poor functional outcomes at 6 months. This systematic review highlights the available evidence for CA disruption during cerebrovascular diseases and its possible association with long-term neurological outcome. CA may be disrupted even before acute stroke in patients with untreated chronic hypertension. Monitoring CA may help in establishing individualized management targets in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaHypertensionIschemic StrokeStrokeSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialAdultCerebral HemorrhageCerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisHumansTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTissue Plasminogen ActivatorAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageCerebral autoregulationIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemic strokeNear-infrared spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35378665
OpenAlexW4226142490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.