Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383374›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefotaxime indicates that higher doses are required for critically ill children.

Stan J F Hartman, Parth J Upadhyay, Ron A A Mathôt, Michiel van der Flier, Michiel F Schreuder, Roger J Brüggemann, Catherijne A Knibbe, Saskia N de Wildt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03248349 (Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03248349 unknown statusnot on this map

Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Children

TypeobservationalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsCritical Illness, Infectious Disease, ChildrenArmsPharmacokinetics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biofilm-Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance in PediatricAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stan J F HartmanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3281-3244
Parth J UpadhyaySystems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ron A A MathôtDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Pharmacy - Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel van der FlierPediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel F SchreuderDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9725-4856
Roger J BrüggemannDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-725X
Catherijne A KnibbeSystems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9893-4415
Saskia N de WildtDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0502-0647
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Radboud university medical center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCefotaxime is frequently used in critically ill children, however pharmacokinetic (PK) studies to support adequate dosing in this patient population are limited.

objectivesTo characterize cefotaxime PK in critically ill children and evaluate exposures achieved by current and alternative dosing regimens.

methodsChildren (0-18 years) admitted to the paediatric ICU, receiving intravenous cefotaxime (100-150 mg/kg/day, interval 6-8 h) were included (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03248349). Total plasma cefotaxime concentrations were measured on multiple study days. Population-PK analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM™). Dose evaluations were performed using typical patients across the paediatric age range and target attainment was determined for MICs of 0.5, 2 and 4 mg/L.

results479 cefotaxime plasma concentrations from 52 children (median age 1.6, range 0.03-17.7 years) were used to describe cefotaxime PK. We describe a two-compartment structural model with interindividual variability, including bodyweight as covariate for volume of distribution and clearance. Model predicted exposure for 150 mg/kg/day (current dose) showed trough concentrations <0.5 mg/L in patients >4 years of age. The maximum cefotaxime doses (200 mg/kg/day, interval 6 h) proved adequate for MICs ≤0.5 mg/L across the whole age range. Similar daily doses with increased frequency (interval 4 h) covered MICs up to 2 mg/L, while a loading dose followed by continuous infusion regimens are needed to adequately treat MICs of 4 mg/L.

conclusionsHigher cefotaxime doses are required for adequate exposure for most pathogens in critically ill children. A higher dose frequency or continuous infusion is advisable to improve target attainment for intermediately susceptible pathogens.

Indexed as

CefotaximeCritical IllnessAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaxime

Identifiers

PMID35383374
PMCPMC9155601
OpenAlexW4226086867

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.