Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35384694›Full record

ReviewJournal of virology2022

Reappraising the Value of HIV-1 Vaccine Correlates of Protection Analyses.

P J Klasse, John P Moore

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J KlasseDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8222-278X
John P MooreDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-6096
Cornell University · US

Funding

Structural studies of native-like SOSIP trimersP01AI110657 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MOORE, JOHN P · 2015 to 2024
$35.4M
Neutralization of Primate Immunodeficiency VirusesR01AI036082 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JOHN P MOORE · 1994 to 2026
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI110657NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the much-debated exception of the modestly reduced acquisition reported for the RV144 efficacy trial, HIV-1 vaccines have not protected humans against infection, and a vaccine of similar design to that tested in RV144 was not protective in a later trial, HVTN 702. Similar vaccine regimens have also not consistently protected nonhuman primates (NHPs) against viral acquisition. Conversely, experimental vaccines of different designs have protected macaques from viral challenges but then failed to protect humans, while many other HIV-1 vaccine candidates have not protected NHPs. While efficacy varies more in NHPs than humans, vaccines have failed to protect in the most stringent NHP model. Intense investigations have aimed to identify correlates of protection (CoPs), even in the absence of net protection. Unvaccinated animals and humans vary vastly in their susceptibility to infection and in their innate and adaptive responses to the vaccines; hence, merely statistical associations with factors that do not protect are easily found. Systems biological analyses, including artificial intelligence, have identified numerous candidate CoPs but with no clear consistency within or between species. Proposed CoPs sometimes have only tenuous mechanistic connections to immune protection. In contrast, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a central mechanistic CoP for vaccines that succeed against other viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. No HIV-1 vaccine candidate has yet elicited potent and broadly active NAbs in NHPs or humans, but narrow-specificity NAbs against the HIV-1 isolate corresponding to the immunogen do protect against infection by the autologous virus. Here, we analyze why so many HIV-1 vaccines have failed, summarize the outcomes of vaccination in NHPs and humans, and discuss the value and pitfalls of hunting for CoPs other than NAbs. We contrast the failure to find a consistent CoP for HIV-1 vaccines with the identification of NAbs as the principal CoP for SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV-1AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingArtificial IntelligenceCOVID-19 VaccinesData Interpretation, StatisticalHIV InfectionsHumansSARS-CoV-2AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 Vaccinesclinical trialscorrelates of protectionCOVID-19HIV-1neutralizing antibodiesnonhuman primatesnonneutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2SIVsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35384694
PMCPMC9044961
OpenAlexW4224983855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.