ReviewJournal of virology2022
Reappraising the Value of HIV-1 Vaccine Correlates of Protection Analyses.
Review in Journal of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Failure of AIDS Vaccine Efficacy Trials: Where to Go from Here.Journal of virology · 2023Trial
- Rethinking non-human primate models for emerging viral infections after COVID-19.Laboratory animal research · 2026Review
- A Population-Based HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trial Design: Statistical Framework and Design Considerations.Vaccines · 2026Review
- The RV144 Trial Might Still Yield Useful Information.Current HIV research · 2026Review
- Losing Less in Translation: Relating the Preclinical Evidence Base for Active and Passive Immunity to Prevention of HIV-1 Infection in Humans.Journal of medical primatology · 2025Review
- The HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein: structure, function and interactions with neutralizing antibodies.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- A modification to heptad repeat 1 of gp41 improves yield and/or quality of soluble pre-fusion HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Optimizing human B cell repertoire analyses to interpret clinical data and design sequential HIV vaccines.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Unpredicted Protective Function of Fc-Mediated Inhibitory Antibodies for HIV and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Review
- A cross-sectional survey about behavior of wearing condoms among college students who engage in sexual activity: the mediating role of attitudes of preventive behavior.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- AI applications in HIV research: advances and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Tat-dependent conditionally replicating adenoviruses expressing diphtheria toxin A for specifically killing HIV-1-infected cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Glycan heterogeneity as a cause of the persistent fraction in HIV-1 neutralization.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Direct intranodal tonsil vaccination with modified vaccinia Ankara vaccine protects macaques from highly pathogenic SIVmac251.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- A non-neutralizing glycoprotein B monoclonal antibody protects against herpes simplex virus disease in mice.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Systems Vaccinology in HIV Vaccine Development.Vaccines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the much-debated exception of the modestly reduced acquisition reported for the RV144 efficacy trial, HIV-1 vaccines have not protected humans against infection, and a vaccine of similar design to that tested in RV144 was not protective in a later trial, HVTN 702. Similar vaccine regimens have also not consistently protected nonhuman primates (NHPs) against viral acquisition. Conversely, experimental vaccines of different designs have protected macaques from viral challenges but then failed to protect humans, while many other HIV-1 vaccine candidates have not protected NHPs. While efficacy varies more in NHPs than humans, vaccines have failed to protect in the most stringent NHP model. Intense investigations have aimed to identify correlates of protection (CoPs), even in the absence of net protection. Unvaccinated animals and humans vary vastly in their susceptibility to infection and in their innate and adaptive responses to the vaccines; hence, merely statistical associations with factors that do not protect are easily found. Systems biological analyses, including artificial intelligence, have identified numerous candidate CoPs but with no clear consistency within or between species. Proposed CoPs sometimes have only tenuous mechanistic connections to immune protection. In contrast, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a central mechanistic CoP for vaccines that succeed against other viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. No HIV-1 vaccine candidate has yet elicited potent and broadly active NAbs in NHPs or humans, but narrow-specificity NAbs against the HIV-1 isolate corresponding to the immunogen do protect against infection by the autologous virus. Here, we analyze why so many HIV-1 vaccines have failed, summarize the outcomes of vaccination in NHPs and humans, and discuss the value and pitfalls of hunting for CoPs other than NAbs. We contrast the failure to find a consistent CoP for HIV-1 vaccines with the identification of NAbs as the principal CoP for SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.